I'm Lovin' It

close

Well, California may have let us all down with their failure to pass Proposition 19 but at least they've gotten one thing right this week. The city of San Francisco has banned fast-food chains from giving away free children's toys with their meals -- a marketing ploy that, frankly, is not a million miles away from child abuse.

After all, the intention of this strategy is to link extremely unhealthy food with the receiving of fun gifts in the minds of children. It is a craven manipulation designed to generate profits at the expense of the health of children. And let's remember, children are particularly susceptible to this form of emotional and psychological manipulation as they are still -- to use Gregory Bateson's phrase -- "learning to learn". Indeed, all marketing aimed at children is no less than a conscious attempt to influence the development of the young mind and train it to be a less critical consumer. When the marketing involves a product that is so unhealthy, it's all the worse.

So well done San Francisco, and here's hoping other places quickly follow suit.

EDIT: reading a bit more about this, it seems that the practice hasn't been completely banned. Just that "restaurant kids' meals [must] meet certain nutritional standards before they could be sold with toys". Not perfect, but it certainly ends the "Happy Meal with Toy" phenomenon, which is a step in the right direction.

I'm sure you'll already have read "Fast Food Nation" - in which case you'll know that the insidious marketing of supremely unhealthy fod towards young minds who aren't yet developed enough to understand the long-term disadvantages of eating too much of it has been going on since the aftyer math of WW2. When was in California I noticed that San Francisco seemed to have a distinct lack of conspicuous obesity compared to Los Angeles, San Diego or even the far nearer Santa Cruz, so it doesn't surprise me that their governing body has taken the initiative on that issue. I initially attributed it to the fact that it's a small enough city for people to be able to walk everywhere, but after visiting the far smaller Santa Cruz and Monterey I concluded that it must have been down to a greater degree of health-consciousness.

As seems the current trend, unfortunately many mums argue that they don’t want to be told by big government what their children should be eating.

More importantly, California did not pass the law that would have kept California industries from having to obey greenhouse gas laws as long as unemployment stayed above 5.5 percent. It was an obvious piece of energy-industry friendly legislation that would have been an incentive for corporations to NOT hire.