close
more_vert

Merrick wrote:
The attention and treatment given by a homeopath are different to that given by a GP. Being told by a trained person that they're treating your whole person, getting an hour's consultation, it's a lot more involving. I suspect this is why a lot of healers practices work.
Yes, but this shouldn't be discounted as being irrelevant. Spending an hour with a patient discussing their background, their living conditions, their mental worries, their family history, other problems and ailments, while being sympathetic and actually listening to the patient, rather than giving them a 5 minute interview in which the doctor is typically arrogant and high-handed, probably makes a large and significant difference, wouldn't you say?

Of course, it's a lot easier for a homeopath to do this unlike an NHS doctor because you're paying for the priviledge. Nevertheless, it seems a better way of going about things and I'd be inclined to find ways to make this available to all for free rather than try to shut it down.

This is a bit off-topic. I'm as scientifically sceptical as anyone about the homeopathic tinctures, but there's far more to homeopathy than prescribing pills- indeed, the whole focus of homeopathy is finding an alternative to just prescribing pills, which often have harmful side effects. I think the principle of treating the whole person, on concentrating on the importancr of diet and lifestyle are pretty common sense measures, and this is what homeopathy is more about than the media uproar about 'sugar water' scams.

Again, I was a sceptic, but my girlfriend has received remarkable results from a homeopath in the last couple of years. Not from taking useless pills- that was what the NHS doctor tried to give her. But from changing her diet and taking herbal supplements, fish oil etc. I won't go into details, but it's worked, and it makes sense as to why it worked, too.

Don't throw the baby out with the sugar water as far as homeopathy is concerned, is all I'm saying.

I'd go along with that. A sensible view point.

Hunter T Wolfe wrote:
Yes, but this shouldn't be discounted as being irrelevant.
I absolutely agree, making a patient feel listened to, advising them on a range of aspects of their life that will improve it for them undoubtedly makes a huge difference. Indeed, that's the point I was suggesting!

and I completely agree that such a level of treatment should be available to all (and i dare say would go a long way to paying for itself by preventing expensive conditions from occurring)

Hunter T Wolfe wrote:
there's far more to homeopathy than prescribing pills
True, and again we broadly agree.

I think the difference between us comes in the validity of ascribing the healing power to homeopathic pills.

Surely we should be finding what works. What elements of the homeopaths treatment work? Can we replicate or even improve these? Are they, as the evidence overwhelmingly suggests, getting results from things other than their pills?

If that's the case then we could give people effective treatment. And if it's the interaction that works rather than the pills, then putting the pills in bottles and selling them in chemists labelled for specific ailments is surely misleading and betrays the people suffering who could be being given effective treatment instead.