close
more_vert

Jim Tones wrote:
Shelby Mustang wrote:
it's an odd one isn't it? shit as the BNP is they do have rights. that doesn't mean we shouldn't throw stones and drop grand pianos on them from thirteenth storey windows when they walk past but alas they do have rights.

the entertainment value of watching the idiot paint himself into a corner is surely worth running the risk of being called a nazi by the telegraph though.

Ha yeah, who the fuck are the Daily Telegraph anyway?
The Guardian are the same, yuppy champagne socialists!

Whether I want to watch a documentary about Nazis, Blue Whales or Serial Killers is my choice ;-D

The sooner people realise that fascism is no different to communism (as well as all that sharia shite), the better for everyone (although it will never happen of course).

Hmmm. Fascism is extremely different from communism (ideologically at least), because it's based around the belief in a natural and inevitable hierarchy amongst humans whilst communism - at least in theory - is based around the principle that all humans have the potential to become equal.

This doesn't mean that the results of communism are any better in practise than those of fascism, but the conceptually they're diametrically opposed.

It's like

treat everyone as if they were angels
vs
treat everyone as if they were devils

or

Freud
vs
Rogers

How to simplify and loose impact in one easy lesson!

Popel Vooje wrote:
Hmmm. Fascism is extremely different from communism (ideologically at least), because it's based around the belief in a natural and inevitable hierarchy amongst humans whilst communism - at least in theory - is based around the principle that all humans have the potential to become equal.

This doesn't mean that the results of communism are any better in practise than the results of fascism, but the philosophy behind the two systemns of belief are diametrically opposed.

They're both about extreme forms of control, is what I was getting at I suppose.

Fuck Hitler! Fuck Mao!