Thatch falls

close
more_vert

"Tragic though the sinking of the Belgarno was..and the subsequent loss of life..I dont think there is any doubt that the Belgrano represented a potential threat and had to be attacked."

Oh that's OK then. It was within the Marquis of Queensbury rules so no blame can be pinned on her.

On the other hand, you could say that she sent hundreds of 18 year old naive conscripts to the bottom of the ocean as a direct consequence of her face-saving decision to go to war to cover her government's "error" of withdrawing our patrol from the vicinity of islands over which Britain's sovereignty couldn't be less sustainable under international law and which couldn't be named by 99% of British people prior to the crisis.

There was a day-long broadcast of a parliamentary debate on whether to go. As I recall, only Tony Benn and Enoch Powell spoke against. Good for them.

The people of the Falklands are still getting their kids educated at schools in Buenos Aries, like they always did, and the 18 year olds are still at the bottom of the ocean.

When the soldiers came back there was a victory parade in London, with Thatcher taking the salute of the troops (a job normally reserved for royalty).

In case it ruined the spectacle they didn't invite the ones who'd come home maimed or disfigured. What honour.

(After media outcry the government caved in).

I think it is pretty desperate to try and demonise Thatcher over the Falklands War. There can be no doubt that, although Britain and Argentina had been negotiating sovereignty for many years, under direction of the UN (I think)..the islands were/are under British sovereignty...and the islanders position on their self-determination was/is to remain that way.
Argentina's military invasion of British sovereign soil had to be fought..