close
more_vert

Secondary post. What's with the clock-watching? Why is it so significant that it takes 16 hours or 16 days to make a point? I am getting the sense that the political wing of HH is staffed by "train-spotters". Sorry if I can't keep up...but it's as much about motivation as opportunity. Perhaps if there were a few more interesting posts..and less feeble justifications of support for New Labour..I might be a bit more inclined to be more responsive..
Honestly, though, ..can't you see Brown & New labour disintegrating before your very eyes?

And why doesn't anyone ever mention:
- IRAQ
- PENSIONS
?

Would have been good if new labour had done something in Heanor East/West, better than the fucking BNP getting in

Margaret_Thatcher wrote:
And why doesn't anyone ever mention:
- IRAQ
i don't see anyone avoiding that. In fact, I've repeatedly asked you about it on the 'Bad night for Nulabour' thread, and you've entirely ignored it.

Ok fair enough, it's almost as if you've blown the gaff, and you're probably right to continue ignoring when people actually do answer you.

I will say something though, if you were a true fan of Thatcher, Boris and Cameron should be making you weep with despair. As much I can not tolerate what she and her ilk stood for, she did at least have a 'proper' political head on her. An intellect, like Major was, and many others, and like Brown and Even Blair. That does not in any way endorse any of them as policy makers, you understand, it's just one of those *facts*.

But the other two really are a pair of kid ons. Not even close to being in the same league. Risible actually. But if its a case of whatever you think it'll take to get the Cons back in (as less and less importance is placed on politicians who know wtf they're talking about it seems), the dubious pleasure is all yours.

x