Fitter Stoke wrote:
Yes, it would've been interesting to hear Celibidache's take on Mahler given his obvious Brucknerian credentials. I'm sure I read somewhere though that he hated Mahler which, if true, I find very difficult to comprehend. But ol'Sergiu was a very strange, if great, man!
It may have been that he saw Brahms - Bruckner - Beethoven as something of a closed circuit that needed no further embellishment and sought virtues in "modernism" in France and Russia instead of Vienna. He may also have simply not had any offers given the absence of recordings to illustrate his approach and process. There may well have been a fear among festival organisers and orchestra managements that he would take the symphonies so slowly the hall unions would be making out like bandits in overtime payments!
More recommendations for the 4th would be welcome. I have Horenstein, Tennstedt, Pinnock, Reiner ('58 Chicago) and Tilson Thomas none of which really entirely do it for me. I have heard the Abbado and liked it a lot (and I love von Stade's voice applied to almost anything) but have not bought that set yet.