close
more_vert

So, is that similar to the various interpretation/theories of quantum mechanics i.e. Copenhagen Interpretation, Bohr, the collapse of the wave function and all that? If so (and if I understand it correctly), that is a case where there are various interpretations of the results, all resulting in internally consistant theories, but the theories contradict one another. That doesn't involve the unscientific practice of jumping to a conclusion, it is more a case of it illustrating that no-one has the full picture. Or have I got that wrong too?! My brain hurts.

Nope you've got it right, its kind of the next step onwards from that. It is however not fundamentally different to any kind of philosophical analysis based on a limited semiotic (the semiotic system in this case being mathematics). However, the way its being used is not limited enough, hence the massive differences in possible theoretical outcomes. Soooo... its no different, and no more scientific in a proper sense than say.. comparative theology in method. It is *gasp* subjective, but an awfully clever mathematically obfuscated subjectivity.

What I'm trying to say is, no fucker knows, but a lot of people are trying to know, don't hate the players, hate the game.