Newgrange forum 26 room
Image by Joe McGuinness
close
more_vert

“ We can see there's a large area of the wall that isn't faced with quartz, the several metres each side of the entrance, and the last few metres at the extreme ends. “

O ‘Kelly said “ we found that quartz was thickest and most extensive In the area outside the tomb entrance and at each side of it . “Which is also problematic for an accurate reconstruction . It also echoes what was found at Knowth and Knockroe , i.e. an emphasis of quartz at the entrance(s), the one area where the façade is quartz free .


“If the quartz was smashed it might suggest that much of it had already been broken up into smaller chunks for the wall facing, leaving some of them brittle? “

The smaller the chunks the less stable the (almost ) vertical structure is likely to be . The point is that they were "A good quantity …. and could not be used “ meaning that much of the actual material was dumped and had to be replaced .The replacements must have come from somewhere but not from the original revetment or sloping cover or platform .

This might be interesting .
http://www.meathheritage.com/index.php/event/hill-of-tara-lecture-series-2016-lecture-3

I'm heading over for this talk, should be good and I'll report back if anything new comes up.

I think the amount of Quartz used is a red herring, in his drawing of the wall in the book O'Kelly has it looking about a foot deep or so but this wasn't necessary with the concrete support. Along with the missing Quartz outside the entrance and the tapering at the sides there's no need for conspiracy theories about it.

I also think when you see them up close the Quartz blocks used are not unsuitable for revetment wall building, particularly when the greatest force of the cairn is retained by the kerb. The builders knew this, the arcs of boulders within the cairn show they understood it's easier to retain the cairn layers if you secure the lowest levels.