Newgrange forum 26 room
Image by mmccann
close
more_vert

There was no agenda behind building the quartz wall, in fact the brief from the Board of Works and the Tourist Board was to create a shapely hemispherical mound of stones.

The problem was instead of a solid mound of stones, behind the kerbstones they found layers and layers of compressed turf. When the turf was freshly laid it had to have been much thicker, therefore the mound behind the kerbstones had to be a lot higher originally than at other passage tombs. The quartz was found on the ground at the very bottom of the piles of stone that had slid from above. There was no quartz found under kerbstones that had fallen over so it is unlikely to have been laid on the ground, it was on the face of the mound as at other passage tombs like Cairn T at Loughcrew.
O'Kelly built a section of the wall back up and had it pushed over and then inspected the result and it closely matched his impression for how the wall should have looked.

There's lots of examples of near vertical stone walling in Neolithic monuments, Barnenez, Petit Mont, Gavrinis, La Hogue Bie. Newgrange would not have been the first of its kind, apart from the facing being of quartz rather than granite blocks.

The entrance to Newgrange does have dry stone walling similar to other monuments , but it is not of quartz and nor original either , iirc . Quartz tends to fracture conchoidally rather than along structural planes making it useless for walling and thus necessitating a steel reinforced concrete wall to support the present façade of relatively small quartz stones (interspersed with granite , and gabbro cobbles ), not slabs , as we would expect for walling .
When large amounts of quartz are found associated monuments it is often as a covering , rather than a wall ,and never a vertical wall .
“We found that the quart/granite layer was thickest and most extensive in the area outside the tomb entrance and at each side of it that it decreased gradually in amount and extent until it virtually disappeared atK21 in the west and K 81 in the east “ i.e. a clear emphasis on the entrance just as is found at other monuments with no suggestion of a wall , but that is not how it is represented in the modern façade which is a homogenous feature for a much greater extent .

The ground under the quartz at Newgrange had been cleared of vegetation “” a subsoil surface from which the turf and humus had been cut off “ O ‘Kelly p68 , suggesting that it might have been in preparation for the quartz as opposed to the quartz collapsing on to vegetation .
As for where we stand now Gabriel Cooney’s “The wall is likely to stand for far longer in the present than it did in the past , if it ever did “ strikes a couple of pieces of quartz together .