fitzcoraldo wrote:
Given that many of these lovely bullaun stones are definitely associated with christian sites, do you not think we should be classifying them in the same way we classify holy wells i.e. placing disputed antiquity labels on them, unless they have clear prehistoric provenances?
I think I will hand that one over to Mr Fourwinds, however I would think it is "the which came first argument". Did the christain site locate at this spot because of an earlier prehistoric bullaun stone or was a bullaun stone put there at the same time as the christain site. cheers fitz