Lancashire 18
Image by thesweetcheat
Lancashire

Lancashire

And I'm tired of the comedy persona as well. Need to remove as much traceable material, with that id, that's available via Google, as possible. There's a lot still left.

The Bolton sites are being recognised now, as well the Northumberland stuff - it's all happening at once. I worked out all the declinations that were indicated by the Smithills rows - and have just tested one of them - the Mayday sunrise at the Thurstones. It's spot on. Bolton have not squashed my plan to rebuild one of the rows as sculpture - they have also not squashed my plan to claim some Hepworth sculpture as Finder's Fee (but there's time yet).

I suppose a new site group needs starting and the pressure I'm getting is that it should be called 'Bolton' rather than 'Smithills'. Also I thought that the Spica sightline, at Thurstones, was blocked by trees but it's not - it's still open.

as always lots of answers to questions i didnt ask BG! i dont want to annoy/antogonise anyone i just wanted to know if there was a genuine reason why youd decided to pull the sites? does this mean your going to add a group for these sites and put them back?

>they have also not squashed my plan to claim some Hepworth sculpture as
>Finder's Fee (but there's time yet).

Are you saying that you've found a Babara Hepworth sculpture BG??

Hi BG,

Just repeating what I said back in April this year.

http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/forum/?thread=17805&message=195235

You need a seperate grouping like the Ed's have done for Anglezarke and enter them as a misc site until they can be confirmed, it seems to be working quite well !

What does everyone think ?

RIV

P.S. Welcome back Mr. Treehugger !!