Arbor Low forum 11 room
Image by Zeb
Arbor Low

What Is It??

close
more_vert

don't forget henges don't always have stone settings within them, and some stone circles aren't in henges.

but i'll go along with steve, to some extent that major earthworks are pushing the limit of technology...perhaps. because if they were being constantly improved why stop at just one bank and ditch? (although i suppose you could argue that building a 2nd or 3rd like at thornborough is the improvement, or the setting of stone circles within the henge).

what fascinates me is the idea that it is the ditch that is the important aspect, as opposed to the bank. lots has been written about the effect of the bank generating a false horizon, or open 'church', but some believe it is the ditch that was more important. brodgar has a ditch cut into the bedrock, and if they are descended from causewayed enclosures perhaps the ditch is of significance more than the its spoil heaped up in a bank.

> what fascinates me is the idea that it is the ditch that is the important aspect, as opposed to
> the bank

I've pondered on the significance of the internal ditch many a time. Keeping spirits in is the best I can come up with!

Don't forget though that many (all?) irish henges have no ditch, also that some of the earliest stone circles could have been built instead of henges due to the lesser effort required. I can't recall which two Burl compares but he looks at a henge & a circle both of which had the same sized internal space, the circle however required (I think),less than half the effort...
There is also a suggestion of banking at Castlerigg and other cumbrian sites.

Some stone circles in Yorkshire (and elsewhere I'd guess) had stones set into a rubble bank, but no ditch.