Stonehenge and its Environs forum 134 room
Image by RiotGibbon
close
more_vert

I suspect the Government just gave the tunnel budget away to Northern Ireland so maybe the whole thing will be quietly dropped. I've read Mike Pitt's article, he is careful to say it is not a polemic ... and yet it is; even though he is at pains to say archaeologists working for the tunnel builders would take as much care over any finds as David Jacques has done at Blick Mead and hey .. hasn't Jacques already destroyed the Blick Mead environment by excavating it. I do wonder why he brought Donald Trump into the equation for any other reason than to elicit a reaction - the vision of Trump and May walking around Stonehenge holding hands is the stuff of comedies.

I live in north Wiltshire, my heart belongs to Avebury, Silbury and the Ridgeway (can I have Uffington too). I'm sad and and sorry about the intractable road/tunnel situation at Stonehenge. My own view is the traffic (too many people in vehicles trying to get somewhere as fast as possible) that is the problem, not the historic A303. If they don't want to be delayed they should take another route - or stay nearer home.

Goodness knows why he's implying Trump would be beneficial to Stonehenge - we've already highlighted several times how Trump is trying to facilitate damage to loads of US National Parks https://heritageaction.wordpress.com/?s=trump and goodness knows why he decries "personal attacks" when he himself has said the Stonehenge Alliance (which actually comprises very genteel people) acts like “the archaeological wing of Donald Trump’s social media campaign” and their leaflet is “worthy of Putin-supporting trolls”.

He's all over the place on the Stonehenge issue and increasingly isolated amongst his peers. There are thousand of British archaeologists yet apart from a few employed by EH, HE and the NT I can't think of any others who are pro short tunnel. Can you?