nigelswift wrote:
You speak, yet again, as if it's a process of balancing transport needs against heritage needs.
You may be right Nigel. It's not......
But if you are wrong, the Heritage lobby needs to quickly understand where the soft spots in the assessment are and then how to shape the "Expert 21" comment so that additional value materialises to work in favour of their arguments.
On the other hand, if you are right, they can ignore all that.
