If the decision is made not to provide quantifiable comparisons between choices, then society as a whole suffers because it will not always get to appreciate that other, better, choices could have been made.....

I understand what you are saying. Yes a unit of comparison would be highly desireable. But since every case is different and every site has a million variables it can't be done.

Heritage choices therefore come from two sources. Attempts to allocate weightings, as suggested by EH/HE Advice notes and Inspectors' cae law - which are good though only broad brush .... and the rather less savoury miasma of vested interests and Govt. overrides for political agenda reasons.

Good luck with producing a common unit of comparison out of that lot!

You have yet to provide any examples whereby anyone can actually quantify the values . Decisions are taken based on subjective comparisons but there is no agreed method .
Benjamin Harrison odiously suggested two black slaves should be considered the equivalent of one white labourer , when it came to wealth production , he didn't have a problem with method . The vast majority of us do . Does 90 minutes of watching Lionel Messi provide greater nourishment for our souls than the local parish community singing of "Amazing Grace " , or does contemplation of a flat field containing a BA linear cemetery trump Fermat's last theorem ?