Stonehenge and its Environs forum 134 room
Image by Chance
close
more_vert

Oh go on then, here's a few professional archaeos who have published pieces against the proposed tunnel:

Dr George Nash https://heritageaction.wordpress.com/2017/02/08/the-stonehenge-tunnel-another-viewpoint/

Dr Rachel Pope https://twitter.com/preshitorian

Professor Dan Hicks: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/the-a303-is-part-of-the-stonehenge-setting-dont-bury-it-a7543226.html
http://theconversation.com/archaeologist-the-a303-is-a-crucial-part-of-stonehenges-setting-71451

Penelope Foreman (less unequivocal, but still "anti-tunnel"): https://suspiciousmounds.wordpress.com/2017/01/17/under-stonehenge/

There are plenty of others who are lending support to the Save Stonehenge campaign (Dr Matt Pope, Dr Kenny Brophy, etc). Most of the ones with links to EH/NT are saying nothing, rather than coming out in support of the scheme.

thesweetcheat wrote:
Most of the ones with links to EH/NT are saying nothing, rather than coming out in support of the scheme.
.... and, equally telling, EH, HE, NT, Highways England and the Govt. have issued a series of statements and press releases containing porkies. We've been documenting them. There have been 25 so far. Rather more than can be dismissed as not an agenda to mislead.

https://heritageaction.wordpress.com/?s=yowling