Stonehenge and its Environs forum 134 room
Image by Mr Hamhead
close
more_vert

I don't really understand; if it's such an important discovery why don't they go ahead & do a full investigation? Is it to do with the cost, or landowners permission or something? It seems straightforward to me so I'm probably being naive & ignorant of procedure. What I mean is, that I just assumed that now they would just start a huge excavation.

It is to do with getting permission ,and luckily it is not just handed out to serve our curiosity .

We have seen how much damage we have caused in the past by destroying imortant evidence due to our ignorance and unsophisticated approaches . To dig now is to destroy something that future generations will see as destruction ,just as we view the destruction done by barrow diggers of the past .Just as out understanding , techniques and technology are far more sohisticated than that of even thirty years ago the attitude is that we should leave well alone except when necessary i.e. when developers are going to build .
Dosh is also important but it's the philosophy of leaving something for the future and not destroy evidence and sites that is most important .

carol27 wrote:
I don't really understand; if it's such an important discovery why don't they go ahead & do a full investigation? Is it to do with the cost, or landowners permission or something? It seems straightforward to me so I'm probably being naive & ignorant of procedure. What I mean is, that I just assumed that now they would just start a huge excavation.
Presumably it is not part of their remit. Surveying is one thing, excavating a totally different matter and subject to special permissions. It took forever to excavate for the stones in the 'missing' Beckhampton Avenue at Avebury and must be very frustrating for all those involved because until done it will remain speculation and another part of the ever continuing 'Stonehenge Story'. All good for business though :-)