Stonehenge and its Environs forum 134 room
Image by RiotGibbon
close
more_vert

But it's like that everywhere though, isn't it. My sister said it was 18 quid to get into westminster abbey the other day. (and it's 25 just to go up the shard. Though I appreciate that's not exactly a national institution just yet).

(and, ranting, once upon a time if you didn't have a job you got into places for cheap. but now you are just officially a workshy scrounger of course and shouldn't be sullying the view of decent hardworking families etc.)

But anyway. You could see it as a good opportunity for EH to make some money out of willing tourists. Which they can feed back into looking after other places. Because god knows their funding is getting cut back. and the obscurest places that we probably love best will get what little attention they receive reduced first.

Rhiannon wrote:
But it's like that everywhere though, isn't it. My sister said it was 18 quid to get into westminster abbey the other day. (and it's 25 just to go up the shard. Though I appreciate that's not exactly a national institution just yet).
That's not an argument in favour of something though, is it? No reason not to try and do things differently. Although I also think the fee charged by Westminster Abbey is a disgrace ;)

G/F and I went to Westminster Abbey 10 years or so ago, we were very disappointed by how little you got to see given the pricey entrance fee. In the spirit of petty churlishness, we've referred to it as The Shabby ever since. :)