ocifant wrote:
The HUGE blooper for me was when Silbury was described as being composed of earth. I'd always thought it was chalk, all the way through!
A bit of both . The initial small mound was just gravel then it covered with top soil , sub soil , turf and the local natural which is clay with flints . Afet rthat it was alternating chalk wit hclay gravel gatrvel and turf hence the Reichian's belief that it was a massive orgone accumulator .