Stonehenge and its Environs forum 134 room
Image by Chance
close
more_vert

moss wrote:
Latest news in The Observer

English Heritage excavations show site has nothing to do with sun worshipping, and find evidence circle was once complete.


English Heritage says it has discovered a "missing piece in the jigsaw" in our understanding of Stonehenge, England's greatest prehistoric site. Excavations along the ancient processional route to the monument have confirmed the theory that it was built along an ice age landform that happened to be on the solstice axis.

The Avenue was an earthwork route that extended 1.5 miles from the north-eastern entrance to Wiltshire's standing stones to the River Avon at West Amesbury. Following the closure of the A344 road, which cut across the route, archaeologists have been able to excavate there for the first time.

Just below the tarmac, they have found naturally occurring fissures that once lay between ridges against which prehistoric builders dug ditches to create the Avenue. The ridges were created by Ice Age meltwater that happen to point directly at the mid-winter sunset in one direction and the mid-summer sunrise in the other.

Professor Mike Parker Pearson, a leading expert on Stonehenge, said: "It's hugely significant because it tells us a lot about why Stonehenge was located where it is and why they [prehistoric people] were so interested in the solstices. It's not to do with worshipping the sun, some kind of calendar or astronomical observatory; it's about how this place was special to prehistoric people.

"This natural landform happens to be on the solstice axis, which brings heaven and earth into one. So the reason that Stonehenge is all about the solstices, we think, is because they actually saw this in the land."

The findings back theories that emerged in 2008 following exploration of a narrow trench across the Avenue. Parker Pearson said: "This is the confirmation. It's being able to see the big picture."

Dr Heather Sebire, English Heritage's Stonehenge curator, said: "The part of the Avenue that was cut through by the road has obviously been destroyed forever, but we were hopeful that archaeology below the road would survive. And here we have it: the missing piece in the jigsaw. It is very exciting to find a piece of physical evidence that officially makes the connection which we were hoping for."

The excavation was conducted by Wessex Archaeology for English Heritage.

The A344 will be grassed over next year as part of English Heritage's £27m transformation of the World Heritage Site, which receives more than 1m visitors annually. There will be a new visitor centre, 1.5 miles away out of sight, to allow Stonehenge to reconnect with the surrounding landscape.

Sebire, who likens the Avenue to The Mall leading to Buckingham Palace, said that the latest findings should prompt vigorous academic debate.

The excavations have also uncovered three holes where missing stones would have stood on the outer sarsen circle, evidence, it is believed, that the circle was indeed once complete. Surprisingly, even the most sophisticated surveys failed to spot them. Two members of staff noticed dry areas of grass, or parchmarks.

Susan Greaney, an English Heritage historian, said: "The discovery … has certainly strengthened the case for it being a full circle."

Asked why no one noticed them until now, Parker Pearson said: "The problem is we've not had a decent dry summer in many years. Stonehenge is always regularly watered, and the only reason these have shown up is because – for some reason this year – their hose was too short … So we're very lucky."

http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2013/sep/08/stonehenge-ice-age-solstice-axis

The excavations have also uncovered three holes where missing stones would have stood on the outer sarsen circle, evidence, it is believed, that the circle was indeed once complete.

I wonder if in the past someone official or otherwise dug in these three places looking for evidence of the 'missing' stones that would have made up the circle, then just back-filled them afterwards and that's what they've 'discovered'? Seems likely that someone would have checked this out donkeys years ago I would have thought but it never got recorded. Just a thought.

"I wonder if in the past someone official or otherwise dug in these three places looking for evidence of the 'missing' stones that would have made up the circle, then just back-filled them afterwards and that's what they've 'discovered'?"

Yes. This could be a significant problem. In addition, were you to construct such a circle, it would make sense to spend a day or two checking all potential hole positions (by digging them out) even if you did not intend to use all of them. You would probably want to do this before you send a few hundred people off to spend the next few years hauling stones 20 miles to the site: They will be mighty miffed if some of the stones turn out to be the wrong length.

Sanctuary wrote:
The excavations have also uncovered three holes where missing stones would have stood on the outer sarsen circle, evidence, it is believed, that the circle was indeed once complete.

I wonder if in the past someone official or otherwise dug in these three places looking for evidence of the 'missing' stones that would have made up the circle, then just back-filled them afterwards and that's what they've 'discovered'? Seems likely that someone would have checked this out donkeys years ago I would have thought but it never got recorded. Just a thought.

The parch marks are in the area that hasn't been excavated (20th C ) but iirc has been geofizzed with negative results .
The negative marks suggest that there is something stopping access of nutrients and moisture for the grass which does not apply to surrounding grass .It could be closely packed chalk ,stones ,a stone etc btw , I'm not necessarily suggesting a sarsen stump .