Stonehenge and its Environs forum 134 room
Image by RiotGibbon
close

The more you look....

http://heritageaction.wordpress.com/2010/07/22/another-henge-found-half-a-mile-from-stonehenge/

Hmmm. So, three henges, roughly aligned.

Sounds more and more like Thornborough really *was* the 'Stonehenge of the North'!

Its all breaking news..Vince Gaffney just been on radio 4 (7.47 it ended, if anyone wants to iplayer it) talking about it..

Might have been an ancient Visitor Centre ; -)

(someone just emailed Radio4 with that - bet it was you Nigel : -)

I just caught quite an in depth report on News 24 including an interview with Vince Gaffney and footage of Stonehenge and surrounding landscape.

What I found exciting is that this was discovered by use of hi-tec scanners, not a trowel in sight. Really good news; the idea of a dig taking place say somewhere like Boscawen-un, a place so elemental and peaceful filled me with a shudder.

this is exciting news, i wounder what else is going to be found.

so thats a new henge, a henge at the bottom of the hill by the river.
a wooden wall? or was that not true?

Old news. ?
http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/forum/?thread=55401&message=698033

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/science-&-technology/stonehenge-may-have-been-a-henge-showroom,-say-experts-201007222932/

Mike Pits' view of the new discovery http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-10726307
Jim.

This is all very pretty (sorry if someone else has already posted it) and it shows you where it is.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/interactive/2010/jul/22/stonehenge-sacred-landscape-archaeology

An excellent account by Alex Down here - http://www.eternalidol.com/?p=7482 The following are just two of several very interesting points in the main feature but see also the comments.

Assuming triangular sections, my calculations show a maximum height of 12m if the hill was created solely from ditch material, a significant difference from the EH figure. It’s probably a coincidence, but the angle of slope created by a height of 12m gives 31 degrees, almost exactly the angle of slope of Silbury Hill. Given the nature of the greensand, I’d be surprised if the mound could have been any higher, as the angle of repose (maximum “steepness”) of dry sand is 32 degrees, 35 for wet sand. A height of 15m would have required an angle of 38 degrees.

Second, the chalk floor is obviously of interest, as it seems to have been specially imported. And that raises the question of whether the chalk itself is sacred. My feeling is that the chalk landscapes of Avebury and Stonehenge are in some way sacred through the medium of the brilliant white chalk, and that special quality was imported into Marden.

Alex Down