Stonehenge and its Environs forum 134 room
Image by baza
close
more_vert

GLADMAN wrote:
"If this was actually leaked by someone then it's a shame to be sure, but... this article is so awful I can't help but wonder what was actually leaked. "

Sadly my Dad gets the Daily Wail....... so I had a 'read'. To be honest you might as well be reading The Sun - where at least the tits are on page 3 and there's no pretension to intelligence. The Mail expose features more Janet and John than Ladybird-book archaeology, so is it any surprise the majority of this great country of ours haven't the faintest idea about their heritage?

What's the old saying again...? If you don't know where you're from, you can't know where you are now. And if you don't know where you are now how can you move forward?... or something like that.

A 'henge without stones'.... I give up.

Despite the leaked story being rather sketchy and the presentation being, well, amateurish, the damage is done i fear, was only a few months to wait for the "official" presentation, i despise people like this and wish ill upon them, really, i don't really believe in karma but i hope it acts out it's role here, if that means i suffer it too then so be it.

They're here.
They've even renamed it, bless em.
With respect and though they were there during the dig what are they mumbling about.
Ps, i'm not for one minute suggesting they were responsible for "outing" this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRMUMqAHsq0&feature=player_embedded#