UncleRob wrote:
But the consensus seemed to be that the "20 foot high fence" had been over-egged by the papers
I don't think it was the papers, judging by the quotes from Mike Pitts and Josh Pollard here - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/2655187/Stonehenge-was-hidden-from-lower-classes.html Glad they're re-thinking though. It was a bit depressing to think of the original Stonehenge hidden away rather than being part of the landscape - and it had put King Arthur in a difficult position as he's vowed to stay camping there until the modern fences are gone!
But a windbreak? That doesn't sound right either.