Stonehenge and its Environs 134
Image by RiotGibbon

Littlestone wrote:
There are similar rites still practiced in some parts of the world, where stones are washed in an act of purification. Perhaps something similar was also going on at Avebury and Silbury, with their abundance of streams, rivers and wells.
There are other reasons for people washing stones before a ritual too. At Magh Adhair, an inaugural site in Clare, the chief used to wash his hands in water that had been rubbed on a piece of stone embedded in a nearby standing stone.

The water collected in bullaun stones is said to cure illnesses (usually just warts these days), but if the stones themselves were seen as holding a cure, then making a bullaun in them to gather water would seem like a sensible thing to do.

I like the healing stone theory. It certainly adds (a little) weight to bullauns being ancient.

It's just an early recognition of the presence and power of minerals in water that pass over/through stones!

I like the healing stone theory.

Me too, hugely.
This bloke puts it nicely -

"The joy of archaeology is that it licenses wild conjecture by subjecting it to the relentless test of science. Here it cries, plus ça change ... In the third millennium BC - as in the third AD - the rich would go anywhere and believe any nonsense if they thought it might win them health and longevity. The Amesbury archer was a Swiss migrant taken by his son to Europe's most famous faith healers, with their magic stones and astronomical mumbo-jumbo. Stonehenge's appeal was not religious. It answered to the simplest of human cravings, the relief of pain and the postponement of death. The Great Cursus points not to heaven but to Harley Street."
http://www.dark-truth.org/dec032006-8-stonehenge-ancient-healing.html