Stonehenge and its Environs 134
Image by Chance

"Dodgy non-scientific wishes"

Jones calls it the Stonehenge Myth, which just happens to make a good story, he says the transportation of the bluestones requires a great deal of imagination - stirring tales of primitive men hauling massive bluestones on sledges from Milford to the Bristol channel (has anyone seen the tidal reach up the estuary) to the Avon Valley on the assumption that a) Preseli area was a sanctified area, b) that they desired/sanctified the stone type which was used for stone axes. Lot of non-rational thought there then.... what we all need is the Tardis to see what really happened..

he says the transportation of the bluestones requires a great deal of imagination

Well, a great deal of experimental archaeology perhaps - e.g.

"stirring tales of primitive men hauling massive bluestones on sledges"
- but evidence suggests they did it with Sarsens from Avebury

"has anyone seen the tidal reach up the estuary"
... but estuary-going Bronze Age boats have been found e.g. at Feriby.

"the assumption that a) Preseli area was a sanctified area, b) that they desired/sanctified the stone type which was used for stone axes. Lot of non-rational thought there then..."
But a rational assumption that they brought their pre-existing circle with them answers that at a stroke.

I think he's glacier-biassed (just as we're human-transportation biassed) and he's quite wrong to say human transportation is a fanciful idea.