Stonehenge and its Environs forum 134 room
Image by Chance
Stonehenge and its Environs

Stonehenge visitor centre plans unveiled

close
more_vert
Moth M
Moth Sep 16, 2004 11:00:54
Replying to baza

Aye.

But as you wickedly know, naughty Baz, widening out to stuff like hostipals & edufication isn't REALLY the issue - it's pretty much impossible to justify any public money being spent on anything other than 'real' stuff like that once you get down to it.

What we're (well, I'm) whinging about is that once the money's not being spent on life-saving/making stuff, it might as well be spent where it is REALLY needed. As far as I'm (we're?) concerned, the preservation of endangered sites is more important than re-jigging the arrangements at 'safe' sites - MASSIVELY desireable as that may be.

love

Moth

B baza
baza Sep 16, 2004 11:11:45
Replying to Moth

EH and the NT spend millions of pounds every year on the restoration and preservation of structures - most of which are modern in comparison to Stonehenge and Silbury Hill.

I can't see any reason whatsoever in whingeing about money being spent on Stonehenge *as well as* any other site.

As I'm prepared to repeat ad nauseum, money being spent on Stonehenge is not stopping any money being spent on Silbury Hill.

Silbury Hill is a separate issue.

:o)


Baz

B baza
baza Sep 16, 2004 11:19:31
Replying to Moth

>Aye.

Is that your answer to my question in another posting, the one I entitled 'P.S.' ?

:o)

Confused even further,

Baz