Long Meg & Her Daughters forum 20 room
Image by Kammer
close
more_vert

Stoneshifter wrote:
There's intuitive evidence that the 'alignments' observed from a stone circle were watched from between, or behind, the stones. In a way that's why my find of an observatory is important, though
If that's the case then nearly every stone circle will have all the orientations indicated . Take Castlerigg and solstice ,stand behind or next to any stone watch where the sun rises /sets and whatever stone or gap between stones is in line shows the alignment .The sun /moon have to rise /set somwhere on the horizon just because you are standing at one spot , a standing stone or some part of a stone circle and can view the rise /set doesn't mean that it is aligned It needs to be indicated to have any credence , e.g. a backsight and foresight or a row /avenue .

My next door neighbour is 'born again'. He thinks that Darwin recanted shortly before he died and that God made everything in six days. My chances of convincing him that evolution is a process are similar to those of me jumping onto the moon tomorrow night. The choice of site for the prehistoric monuments, by their builders, was so elaborate that we can only guess at their knowledge of topography. To decry the alignments at the heart of the arrangements of stone is to miss nine tenths of their beauty. Although Thom senior is now out of favour his work was pioneering and statistically sound. I should quote something he said - but I can't. He deserves a medal! Don't forget that the horizon was the closest the ancients got to a clock (or calendar).