Re: Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited) | Forum

Silbaby 17

Image by Dunstan

Silbaby alignment (Watkins ,Michell revisited)

more_vert

StoneLifter Dec 4, 2006 18:59:52

Replying to nigelswift

And I've been giving you reminders for the moon rise, when I should have been pointing out the northern moon set. It must be to do with drawing the moon energy down into the earth - symbollically.

Is the location of Falkner's Circle accurately known ? 164m. is quite a close fit and wouldn't need much jiggling to form a better fit. If it's over the hill, and out of sight, it could be an error - after all their dry-stone walling was pretty slap dash.

Pete G Dec 4, 2006 19:05:08

Replying to StoneLifter

Do you mean the dry stones walling at WKLB that Prof Piggott reconstructed in the 1950's?
PeteG

nigelswift Dec 4, 2006 19:11:41

Replying to StoneLifter

164m. is quite a close fit and wouldn't need much jiggling to form a better fit. If it's over the hill, and out of sight, it could be an error

Actually, I take it back, an error of 164 m in a mile would make them lousy surveyors, hill or no hill. A few sticks and a bit of string would get you much closer than that.