Silbaby forum 17 room
Image by ocifant
Silbaby

Silbaby -a plea.

close
more_vert

Yes compound errors are a concern, but sometimes two sightings won't do, say when there are ten hills in the way :-) Three poles were good enough for IKB, so they're good enough for me!

There are variations on the theme that leave the first pole in place and alternate the second two as long as you can. This does reduce compound errors somewhat.

Another way is to buy a feckin GPS! Take areading at all three sites and plot them on some graph paper. If you can draw a straight line through them then you're not doing too badly.

To be sure you need to apply lots of line-bending (and mind bending) maths to the points to get lines on the Earth's surface etc, but over very short distances this shouldn't be a major concern. Many people draw a line on a map with a permanent marker and say that sites beneath the scaled 400m wide line are in an alignment, so a little calc error isn't that important.

Did they have graph paper in the Neolithic?

It seems logical (possibly) to line up things that are intervisible.. but things that are over hills? well I suppose you might want to.
Also a stone circle would be more Bronze Age, wouldn't it? Whereas Silbury and the Sanctuary are they not older? Not that you can't line things up that aren't contemporary of course.
Don't know what I'm getting at really, just I would feel cautious I suppose. And I'm waiting for the L word to come up probably.

"Another way is to buy a feckin GPS! Take areading at all three sites and plot them on some graph paper. If you can draw a straight line through them then you're not doing too badly."

I doubt whether prehistoric man had access to graph paper let alone GPS!

Talking about lining things up over hills, isn't it remarkable that the Egyptians managed to square the base of the Great Pyramid to within a few centimetres with a feckin great natural rock outcrop right in the middle, making it impossible to check the diagonals by direct measurement. I reckon they must have used radial distances from a pole on top of the hill on the basis that if each corner is the same distance from the top of the pole and all the sides are equal they must form a square. Actually it's the first time I've thought about this, but the method effectively constructs a "string" pyramid and that would be a fairly logical way to go about the task for somebody whose purpose is to build a pyramid.