Silbaby on TMA | Forum — The Modern Antiquarian

Silbaby 17

Image by Chance

Silbaby -a plea.

more_vert

TMA Ed Nov 23, 2004 11:55:14

Replying to Rhiannon

If Silbaby is to be added to TMA as a site it needs to be made 100% clear that it isn't yet widely recognised as ancient. Also, the grounds for including it should be made clear (not an essay or anything, just something simple).

Perhaps Pete could do this and write a short 'Misc' post about the mound. The site category can't really be set as 'artificial mound' until we are sure it is artificial. Until then it should remain uncategorised.

TMA Ed

Pete G Nov 23, 2004 13:37:16

Replying to TMA Ed

I've posted a photo of Waden hill from the air which shows Silbaby and made some notes mentioning the spring and the mound and that there has been no archaeoligical investigation of the mound to date.
Is that ok?
Perhaps other could expand it from here?

My first on TMA and it wouldn't except Netscape 7.2 and crashed my machine after uploading with Explorer.
PeteG

Moth Nov 23, 2004 14:34:43

Replying to TMA Ed

Thanks!

love

Moth