Lewis and Harris forum 14 room
Image by Moth
Lewis and Harris

Sleeping Beauty

close
more_vert

"However, at its times of generation, about 84% of the wind power was surplus to local demand (White, 2004; Sharman, 2004) and had to be exported to the much larger power systems of Norway, Sweden and/or Germany, primarily to maintain stability of frequency and voltage in the Danish grid."

That's just sloppy management isn't it. The 4% figure is a twisted one, too. The other generators were also providing power at these times, who's to say it wasn't them that were over producing when the wind turbines were at full tilt? Why weren't other generators slowed down?

And although the future will see much more locally produced power, what's wrong with exporting it when you can? At least the nasty polluting generators in Norway, Sweden and/or Germany weren't having to churn out quite so much crap for a while.

And 20-35 years isn't all that long. I've been around longer than that and there hasn't been very large improvements in the systems in my lifetime. If using current renewable energy sources prolongs this period to 50-75 years then it has to be a better option than doing nothing. At least by adopting these now we have a better chance at finding an alternative, long lasting solution.

I quite agree Fourwinds. I remember seeing programmes on tv about energy in the future - must have been about 30 years ago, round about the time Milton Keynes was built. One of the housing estates was used to build modern housing incorporating some of the new technology in energy efficiency available at the time. Since then there's been very little movement in the use of these methods except by a few enlightened people and some places abroad. I'm now living in a house that still has coal fires as it's main form of heating.
The only thing that seems to have taken off is double glazing but where are the heat exchangers to cut down consumption and recycle the heat we produce from just living

Elaine