Lewis and Harris forum 14 room
Image by goffik
Lewis and Harris

Sleeping Beauty

close
more_vert

"Wind energy is not as clean as its proponents would have us believe"
Agreed.
"the (heavily subsidised) scam that is wind power"
Not agreed. Methinks the protestor doth protest too much.

It still comes down to this, however many environmental faults that those who are opposed to it come up with, they can't actually say there's a better alternative.

As I said before, as someone who is apt to protest I know that protesting is the easy bit. The hard bit is suggesting a better way.

Incidentally, the fact that it has to be subsidised by me the taxpayer causes me no concern. That's the whole point about green energy, it's more expensive and we'd better pay now rather than later. I wish Bush, who said he'd never sign any environmental treaty that damaged the American economy, would grasp that basic fact.

Read through the case against wind farms and then tell me you still think they're a good thing.....just because they're sustainable doesn't mean they're environmentally sound.

http://www.countryguardian.net/case.htm


Wind Turbines vs. Energy Saving - a case study

There are 1,628,000 houses in the UK with pitched roof and no roof insulation*

3780 kWh of energy are lost by each such house each year.*

Insulation to 1990 Building Regulations standard would save 3375 kWh p.a.*

The annual output of a 750 kW turbine is 1.64 m units.

Insulating 485 houses would save that amount of energy each year.

New funding arrangements will give wind energy a subsidy of 2p per unit.

The annual subsidy of the turbine will be £32,850.

The cost of insulation is a one-off £122 per house, say £60,000 for 485 houses.

Over the 100 year life of the houses, the energy saving cost averages £600 pa

Saving pollution by insulation is 55 times more cost-effective than saving it by wind turbines!

*Source: Pilkington Insulation, UK Mineral Wool Association