The Long Man of Wilmington forum 19 room
Image by ocifant
close
more_vert

JohnDee007 wrote:
Cursuswalker wrote:
JohnDee007 wrote:
Because without that 'something', they are nothing. Very sad indeed.
This from someone as positive as you?

So cutting!

Now you are taking things personally. I am sorry, it wasn't meant as a personal attack upon your character directly. I was refering to the types who like wear their labels like uniforms, as a means to massaging their egos.
Aha! A double blind. Very clever...

This comment , from somebody who had actually worked on the excavation , was posted recently on Britarch and may be of interest .

Hi,

Can I correct one thing, the Long Man was not re-cut in the 19th century, as
it was never 'cut' in the first place. Our excavations confirmed that it had
never been a chalk-cut figure, and had been laid out in bricks from its
construction in the 16th century.

During one of its numerous re-linings, this one being at the end of the 19th
century, an experiment was carried out to see if it could be cut into the
chalk. This resulted in a cut at the top of the head (re-located in our
excavation). However, the experiment failed and it was once again laid out
in bricks.

Hope this clarifies the popular misconception that the Long Man is a chalk
cut hill figure. A report on our excavations will be forthcoming in Sussex
Archaeological Collections in due course, and interim reports have appeared
in the SAS newsletter.

Chris Butler