Sea Henge forum 15 room
Image by Chris Collyer
close
more_vert

Wildwooder wrote: "I would have thought that wood in a wet environment with wind and tides would be bound to deteriorate eventually, so this seems a longer term option."

How long will a museum preserve the awkward pickled wood once interest dies down? Wood in a wet environment lasts indefinately in the absence of oxygen - that is the real long term option. That is why Seahenge has been preserved for so long. Ditto wooden trackways in Somerset and elswhere. Ditto Roman stakes on the Thames foreshore. Now, Seahenge timbers are chemically preserved and all you have are lumps of pickled wood to display. The academics have measured and analysed and then left us with an exhibit of ancient timbers. Location is all and without that there is nothing. Seahenge was destroyed by the archaeological establishment . It is exactly as if Stonehenge (or any other monument) was dismantled and some of the stones displayed out of context in a museum perhaps with a painted backdrop. Seahenge if left alone would have been in situ for generations. The sea may well have buried it again, but it would still be there where it was intended to be.

>The sea may well have buried it again, but it would still be there where it was intended to be.<

Well, I agree with the rest of your post Peter but not the last line. Unless Seahenge was built by Atlanteans it most certainly wasn't intended to be where it was (under the sea).

Again this is ultimately a question of how to fund appropriate conservation (and not just conservation of the structure but also conservation of the environment into which it was placed). But how do you do that with something like Seahenge where the waves are literally lapping at its doorstep and money is just not available to both <i>see</i> the structure <i>and</i> preserve it? I liked your idea of a damn and I also wonder just how difficult (and how expensive) something like a transparent dome would have been to construct? A dome that would have allowed seawater in when Seahenge was submerged but not out when it was exposed? Perhaps that idea was discussed... perhaps I'm just being fanciful again.