You can read the paper on line. Haven't got a link handy, but it's available to read for free.
If people who are interested in archaeology have to be careful about 'the evidence' after reading a paper like this, what chance does Mr/Mrs Public have?
It's like the Durrington 'stones'. A big hoo-haa, but then we find out that they could be previously investigated chalk capping of post holes. 99% of th people who read the strories in the press will not be aware of that.