I'm disappointed to have to read 'the probable date for the extraction from the recess' and then realise the dates come from the Neolithic occupation layer.
It's disingenuous, at best.
Whilst I obviously love the subject, appreciate the effort, experience and passion of the archaeologists involved, and I excitedly consume the reports and enjoy the discussion, I could do with a great deal more objectivity from those involved to help me, the lowly punter, really understand why two small blocks under a large recumbent near a rock face are any indication of removal of that rock for potential transport to SH.
There is a lot of mist, shall we say.