Stonehenge 181
Image by Jane

tiompan wrote:
Dave1982 wrote:
Well, perhaps not excavation, but non-intrusive scans would be interesting. I wonder how much that would cost? Mmmmm.

Any info on companies that do archaeological scans?

Permission is a bigger problem than dosh .

Because of the problems associated with later activities at the Q holes ,from the 2008 Darvill and Wainwright dig , which led to the Darvill dismissal of much hope , who is even likely to suggest it ?

Dave1982 wrote:
tiompan wrote:
Dave1982 wrote:
Well, perhaps not excavation, but non-intrusive scans would be interesting. I wonder how much that would cost? Mmmmm.

Any info on companies that do archaeological scans?

Permission is a bigger problem than dosh .

Because of the problems associated with later activities at the Q holes ,from the 2008 Darvill and Wainwright dig , which led to the Darvill dismissal of much hope , who is even likely to suggest it ?

Dave , you were about to say ,and the finger slipped ?