nigelswift wrote:
. Durrington suggests there may have been zillions available and that would cast doubt on an awful lot of the experimental archaeology on the subject up to now IMO. Who needs efficiency or cleverness if you've got a hundred rugby teams?
Just to highlight your last comment Nigel and looking again at the whole thing in perspective, it really must have been just a hard slog otherwise surely if there had been a really easy way of shifting weights (not just stone) then it wouldn't have just been forgotten about as generation after generation would have continued in the same way until actual machinery took over. Why change a method if it worked for you and there was nothing better on offer?