Stonehenge forum 180 room
Image by greywether
Stonehenge

lost stonehenge alter stone

close
more_vert
nigelswift N
nigelswift Feb 27, 2007 11:45:38
Replying to slumpystones

If the Altar was flat, what went in the holes in front of 55 and 56, that have been attributed to the Altar stone all these years?

The supports? Now gone?

You know what the problem is? Nobody's bothered to look in case it contradicts established theory, based on bullshit and poor excavation. Nobody wants to stick their neck out in case someone important laughs at them.

Bravo Dennis, then.

S slumpystones
slumpystones Feb 27, 2007 12:14:21
Replying to nigelswift

nigelswift wrote:
If the Altar was flat, what went in the holes in front of 55 and 56, that have been attributed to the Altar stone all these years?

The supports? Now gone?

You know what the problem is? Nobody's bothered to look in case it contradicts established theory, based on bullshit and poor excavation. Nobody wants to stick their neck out in case someone important laughs at them.

Bravo Dennis, then.

Totally! We are standing still as far as Stonehenge archaeology itself is concerned. Oh yes, plenty of pigs bones and houses to marvel at, but they seem to shy away from looking at the big thing right at the centre of it all!!

"I see no stones!"