That is what I am saying - so who is muddying the waters by going on about the A303? Our proposal says leave the A303 for Phase 2 and don't start on Phase 2 until you have finished Phase 1. What are we arguing about? Phase 1 if completed properly gives us what we want and removes all of the crap. The only point I'm sticking with is that we cannot fail to mention the A303 altogether if we want to be heard. So we say "Do it later ie Phase 2" . The proposals have to go to the Highways Agency and their priority is the A303 so we must mention what is paramount to them. Everyone agrees about closing and removing the A 344 and associated junk its not an issue.