Stonehenge forum 180 room
Image by moss
close
more_vert

At Sutton Hoo you can shop till you drop, view copies of goodies still at the BM, see a few genuine baubles, watch a film and never have to trek through the cold and the wet to see the real mounds at all - and most visitors never do. There is a viewing platform for the brave souls who do stagger that far, but the comments are inevitably ones of disappointment. " Where is the ship/treasure/gold/body/sword/helmet?" "They are just hills!" "Is that all there is?" That is why I don't want an OTT visitor centre at Stonehenge that will diminish the real thing.

Bet you'd have preferred to have left Sutton Hoo still in 'earth's grip' Peter ;-)

But yes, I'd forgotten about Sutton Hoo - actually, it's the one place that springs to mind where the visitor centre <i>surpasses</i> the actual site.

I trekked out to see the Sutton Hoo barrows one scorching hot day a couple of years ago - it's about half an hour there and back and there's no shade and no cover and I nearly fainted from the heat! Other than a few mounds in a field that's it. The visitor centre by comparison has an audio-video room where you can hear Old English being spoken; see a reconstruction of part of the boat and its interior; see both replicas and some of the original objects found within the barrow; take in various displays (a great one that I remember went into some detail on the superb quality of Anglo-Saxon steel - they'd developed the folded steel technique some six hundred years before Japanese swordsmiths managed it) and after all that I went for a nice cold drink in the adjacent NT restaurant.

Sutton Hoo is not the Valley of the Kings (which is still worthwhile slogging out to see with or without a visitor centre). I'd say Stonehenge falls somewhere between the two. Every site is different and probably requires a different approach :-)