Stonehenge forum 180 room
Image by jimit
close
more_vert

Yes I saw this.

I haven't been too impressed with the series so far - Spivey seems to be hell-bent on publicizing his ideas without a great deal to back them up. I was a bit worried, for example, when he stated that the Amesbury Archer was from the continent and was probably responsible for the building (shouldn't that have been the rebuilding?) of Stonehenge. If the Amesbury Archer was from the continent (and I accept the fact that tests on his remains may have proved that he was) it doesn't answer intriguing questions such as why he made the arduous journey to Britain in the first place and why he went, and was eventually buried, on Salisbury Plain.

Perhaps those questions will never be answered but perhaps it's also too easy to assume that, because he was from the continent, he or his family were not originally from these islands. We should not dismiss the idea that the Amesbury Archer could have been the child of a noble or priestly family who originated from the area around Stonehenge and, for some reason, travelled aboard. Perhaps the Avebury Archer was returning to his homeland...

I've quite enjoyed the programme, but not sure of its 'value' in terms of good solid education.

As you guys say, it's certainly made some spectacular leaps without any evidence or any real evidence - this just being the latest. This and its habit of only telling 'half a story' both in terms of stuff like not mentioning earlier phases of Stonehenge, and in terms of not fully explaining some bits make it hugely frustrating.

And I do wish people wouldn't insist on presenting theory as fact!!!!! (It's the only thing I don't like about some bits of Julian's megalithic books, too!) There's nowt wrong with sticking a 'probably' or a 'may have' in here & there - it doesn't harm credibility to peeps that don't know much about the subject and GAINS it with peeps that know a bit!!!!

love

Moth

No - his teeth prove that he grew up in Switzerland - its in the water you drink as a child.

The Spivey character actually pushed someone else's ideas as his own, or the programme makers', although I don't think he explicitly stated that. The guest on the first episode, David Lewis-Williams of Wittwatersrand University, is an anthropologist who has been researching the background to cave art for a number of years and published The Mind in the Cave in 2002, from where a lot of the first programme material seems to have come. I've just collected it from the library but rather tome-like.
Didn't watch the second part I'm afraid, we found the Spivey drone rather wearing.