Stonehenge forum 180 room
Image by Jane
Stonehenge

Stone Shifting 3

close
more_vert

It was just another thought. There's no reason why the pole has to go down to the bottom of the hole. It ought to make contact with the monolith at a point that will end up being just above ground level when erected. It may be necessary to bind the pole to the monolith to stop it slipping (a socket timber lashed to the stone would be good), but these forces are quite small compared to the compressive load on the pole and the tension in the rope. My idea was that this system would raise the stone all the way from 70 to 90 degrees and would bring it to a nice controlled stop automatically. A rope with the weight at the middle might not do this in one go, although I haven't worked out the numbers yet, so I can't be sure.

Well, a 100 foot tree trunk would be a massively powerful lever, and no-one can say they didn't have them to hand, nor that they couldn't transport them - there's the remains of 3 totems under the Stonehenge carpark. It's an approach that would get a lot of academic acceptance.

Ah, it's taken an hour for the penny to drop. I thought you were effectively talking about a lever, with the edge of the hole being it's fulcrum, hence my dumb concern it would raise the stone. But now I get it.

About how high the log has to go: might one solution to limiting this be to dig a hole for the basket to lower into?