Stonehenge forum 180 room
Image by jimit
Stonehenge

Stone Shifting 2

close
more_vert
baza B
baza Aug 28, 2003 02:34:14
Replying to Steve Gray

I think that we should be able to get rid of some of the variables.

The height of the uprights at Stonehenge varies. The outer circle is fairly constant, I`ve seen figures of between 13.5 - 16 ft for its height above ground. The inner horseshoe was higher, up to 22 ft. I presume that we`d be going for the lowest figure. I don`t know how deep the stones were set into the ground.

By depth, do you mean width? The width of the stone dragging on the tower? Or is that irrelevant once you know the coefficient of friction?

The figures that I`ve got are 7 ft wide and 3.75 ft deep for the outer uprights, with weight of 25-30 tons.

Can you tell me what the offset variable relates to, please? I don`t understand that one.


baz

S Steve Gray
Steve Gray Aug 28, 2003 23:41:17
Replying to baza

Hi Baz

> I presume that we`d be going for the lowest figure.

Nope, were going for the biggy. A full Trilithon with 40 ton uprights.

> I don`t know how deep the stones were set into the ground.

Apparently it varied, but about 8 feet seems a typical figure.

> By depth, do you mean width? The width of the stone dragging on the tower? Or is that irrelevant once you know the coefficient of friction?

OK, I had to decide whether to refer to the stone as height and width or length and depth, depending on whether you consider it on its side or erect. Because I started calling the height of the tower "height", I decided that I would consider the stone on its side and refer to length and depth to avoid having two different things called "height". That leaves "width" to describe the remaining dimension (the one that's in contact with the tower). Length and depth are the only two figures that effect the moment of inertia (for a stone of uniform dimensions). The width is irrelevant and also does not affect the friction to any significant degree. The coefficient of friction depends only on the nature of the two surfaces regardless of the area of contact. The frictional force (in any given situation) is just the weight acting onto the surface times the coefficient of friction (end of today's course in A-level mechanics).

> Can you tell me what the offset variable relates to, please? I don`t understand that one.

Yes, it's the overhang of the centre of the block from the edge of the tower. I started calling it overhang and refered to it by this name in several TMA postings, but then I changed it to "Offset" just because "Overhang" was too long for the screen space I had allocated. Since my main concern was to finish the model and get it posted I didn't want to spend time resizing all the boxes. Sorry if it wasn't clear. I did think about putting dimension arrows on the picture whenever the cursor moves over a text box. So if you put the mouse over "Height" a dimension arrow would appear next to the tower showing which dimension was height on the picture. Unfortunately this idea was also subject to the time guillotine.
It might make it into the next release, but my main concern is to correctly model the hole.