Stonehenge 181
Image by Chance
Stonehenge

Stone Shifting

I’m not sure about the lateral force either, though I have the same feeling as you. I’m not really sure I understand why there’s a lateral force at all, but I suppose there must be one, since your pallets moved back. Maybe there was some slippage along the pivot point, and that can cause it? Yes, that’s probably it, if the stone pivots perfectly then lateral force may not be a severe issue but if the stone is slipping down the pivot point at the same time then the whole stone is actually moving downwards and since it’s presenting an angled face to the pivot point it converts the downward movement into a sideways force. Or something. C’mon Steve…!

For the purposes of experimental modelling, what are your thoughts on the height of the pivot point for a 32 ft stone and an 8 ft hole? As low as practicable obviously, but how do you see the trajectory of the stone? Presumably, you’ll want it to smack into the near side of the hole at the end of it’s arc? (Or do you?) But near the top or near the bottom?

That word “smack” would be a very satisfying conclusion to the stone tipping. We don’t want to stop all those pivoting tons suddenly, only to watch an unpredictable and uncontrollable bouncing effect. One thought would be an elongated hole, like a trench, with the nearside in the form of a “stopping bed” at an angle a few degrees off vertical and pointing directly at the pivot point. Perhaps with an earthen mound or timbers above, forming an extension to this steep angled surface? Ok, you’d end up with the stone slightly leaning, but it might be worth it for the assurance of a “clean stop”. (Always assuming you think we could then easily haul it upright of course. Could we?)

I'll deal with your last point first, my instinct is to follow what we know of the original, Three vertical sides one sloping side. Now I'm guessing, erect the stone from the sloping side, but make the last foot or so of the sloping side vertical. Set up the system so that the stone has rotated to almost vertical as it enters the last foot or so of the hole. The stone should then slam up against the vertical side and be prevented from toppling forward by the vertical bit of the sloping side.

First point, or was it the second? Its bank holiday Monday so I opened the bar early. 32ft stone, 8ft deep hole, now do I take the 8 from the 32 and divide then add a bit, or devide (Sorry the spellings getting a bit wonky) the 32 then take away the 8 and then add a bit? Where's our maths man? Told you I was a trial and error man, anyway we can get there either way trial and error or maths.