Stonehenge forum 180 room
Image by wysefool
Stonehenge

Stone Shifting

close
more_vert

Maybe they “pulled” when on the level and “rowed” downhill, relying on the track-friction to act as a brake?

I can certainly see that using a combination of both methods you could get fantastic control – you could tilt the front upwards, just as you reached a small hillock, and you could steer it left and right by tilting one side but not the other, whilst pulling.

Also, when you came to a bigger hill, by tilting the front, adding a packing log, tilting the back, adding a larger packing log, then pulling, you could get up the whole hill in a series of small horizontal pulls. By the time you’d got to the top, you’d have travelled by means of a combination of 2 vectors: horizontal, entirely by bullocks pulling horizontally, and vertical, entirely by levers. Both vectors would have been achieved by the most appropriate and energy-efficient means.

I expect I mean oxen, not bullocks. But then, someone may tell me that bullocks is derived from bullox, so it might be right....

Hi Nigel

Probably worth a try

Steering is dead easy though, After step one (Lift the stone) move the levers on each side of the stone in opposite directions. The stone can be turned 360 degrees almost in its own length. (Theoretically anyway I never actually tried it).

Going up a slope of one in eight is as easy as on level provided the stone is prevented from gaining any initial momentum in the wrong direction. Personally I think that oxon would be more trouble than help, believe me it really is that easy. One in eight is a pretty steep hill by the way but I think we could do steeper.

How about forming a loose knit group to test these ideas?

Regards Gordon