http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,992215,00.html
Oh right, some gynaecologist from British Colombia thinks Stonehenge is a representation of a woman's rude bits and publishes his thoughts in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. I'm cancelling my subscription for one.
Coming soon and equally as likely: an article on ovarian dysfunction by an archaeologist published in 'Antiquity'.
Call me a sceptic but some people have only one thing on their minds. He can't even get his facts right and has probably never been to see the site: "Perks adds. 'There is little sign of death; there are no tombs, because Stonehenge was a place of life and birth, not death, a place that looked to the future.' " Tosh there are no burials.
Also he trots out the good old ''There was a concept in Neolithic times of a great goddess or Earth Mother" line - failing apart from bugger-all evidence for this to notice that the stones as we see them are from the Bronze age.
Tch.