Cumbria forum 41 room
Image by Chance
close
more_vert

I can't convince myself they're ploughmarks. If they were, it would seem odd that they vanish on the apex of the stone. Also, can't see any sign of the 'juddering' marks I'd normally associate with a plough being scraped with force over a stone.

The grooves do look more akin to the Welsh arrowstones than to the Fyfield polisher, but the bit below the groves on the Elva stone looks suspiciously flat/smooth.

I reckon it's possible the Fyfield jobbie gives a bit of a false impression of how glassily smooth polissoirs should be, as it's on sarsen, thus less prone to the roughening effects of the weather? What kind of stone are the french polishers on?

Btw, the link TE posted is to a page that's moved on, the original page is now to be found at:
http://www.keswick.u-net.com/80602.htm

The Vannes one is on white quartz and is about half the size of the Fyfield one, the Nantes one is on some kind of pinky-orange quartz and is about the size of a football... I should really put some images up at some point...

Having seen about 30 polissoir stones in France, I have to say that this does not look like any of them, the grooves are much narrower, and nowhere near as smooth. However, the combination of grooves and large rounded basins is very common, grooves for the edges and basins for the sides...

As for the type of stone, the French ones come in all shapes and sizes, and all sorts of stone. I have seen them in quartz, sarsen type stuff, and hard flinty lumps found in a chalky limestone region, but I am no expert on stone type.

One thing that is normally a must is the presence of water, used in the polishing process. Most I saw were near a stream or river. Unless the stone has been moved to its current position at some later date, I would think it unlikely to have been used for polishing where it is now, as it looks like there is no water source.

I could of course be completely wrong.