I wondered the same thing Moth.

Grasping at straws I came to the conclusion that it's a slightly unusual interpretation of the category 'Artistic/interpretive'. My best guess was that the photos are of stones look like something else (in other words, they have been interpreted as something else).

This photo seems to be similar:

http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/38929

Sorry if this is entirely incorrect Jo-anne.

K x

Hi Moth,

I'm doing a painting with 2 of the stones from Stanton Drew, that demonstrate the measurements, geometrics, silhouetting etc, for this I took 2 examples that are easy to see for the novice, I think both photo's that I took as a painting example are on this site.
To demonstrate and share with others as how to interact with the stones is a learning process, small or large the rules are the same, large megaliths UK, small microliths stones NL, I put in an example of one of the small stones, but perhaps it not appropiate to post here? And I can't post images to a weblog.

Perspective and gridding was a major part of the Neolithic period it comes back the stones aswell as in the landscape.

But I don't understaaand (she whined). I can understand that large standing stones might have been picked for their subtle similarity to other things (though I don't know if I generally believe it. But maybe.)

But you saying that any <i>small</i> stone at Stanton Drew like the one here
http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/44461
has got similarities other than coincidental ones?

I don't really understand what you're trying to do, but if you want to explain...