>What I think is missing is an appreciation /interpretation of the wider landscape.

I agree. To be honest, the hurlers spooked me once, so I am a bit ambivalent about the site itself, but it's placement in the landscape was no random act, and this should be highlighted to visitors.

Given that the area has been so worked over in the years since the stones went up, I'm unable to decide if I'd look at reconstruction as just another chapter in it's ongoing history, or as gratuitous tampering with a monument that has put up with enough grief over the years as it is. Fence sitter that I am.